Backed by World Auto Group, IL – investor.

AI AUTOMATIONSOct 2026 · 17 min read
L
ByLokam team

TCPA Compliance and AI Follow-Up Calls: What Dealerships Should Know

Dealerships researching compliance and AI-voice follow-up should start with what the has said. The FCC has confirmed that an AI-generated voice counts as an "artificial or prerecorded voice" under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, so the consent, disclosure and opt-out rules for artificial-voice calls reach AI follow-up calls, absent an emergency purpose or an exemption. Under the regulation, the consent it describes depends on the call: a call with no advertisement that is not telemarketing is treated differently from one that includes an advertisement or constitutes telemarketing. Which side of that line your calls sit on is a question for your counsel.

This page explains public rules; it is not legal advice. Talk to your counsel.

This page covers the check-in after a repair order and the call to a showroom visitor who didn't buy: what the federal rules say about each, what changed since 2024, and what to ask your lawyer.

What are the TCPA laws?

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act is a federal statute, 47 U.S.C. 227. The writes the detailed rules under it, and the FCC's main rules for outbound calls are in one regulation, 47 64.1200, "Delivery restrictions".

In plain words, the statute makes it unlawful to make a non-emergency call "using any automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice" to a cell phone without "the prior express consent of the called party." It also makes it unlawful to call a residential line "using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party," unless an exception applies or the FCC has exempted the call by rule.

The statute also sets basic standards for every artificial-voice message: it must state the identity of the business "at the beginning of the message" and state its telephone number or address "during or after the message."

Who enforces it, and can people sue?

The statute's text names who can enforce it:

A separate private right of action covers do-not-call violations, for a person who got at least two such calls from the same business within any 12-month period, with an affirmative defense for a business that has "established and implemented, with due care, reasonable practices and procedures" to prevent them.

Takeaway

Bring counsel a list of every call your store makes after a visit. Each call then gets matched to the part of the statute it raises.

Does the TCPA cover AI voices?

Yes, according to the . In a Declaratory Ruling adopted February 2, 2024 and released February 8, 2024, the Commission said it was confirming "that the 's restrictions on the use of 'artificial or prerecorded voice' encompass current AI technologies that generate human voices." The ruling took effect on release.

What matters for a dealership:

  1. Consent. Callers using these technologies "must obtain the prior express consent of the called party to initiate such calls absent an emergency purpose or exemption." If the call introduces an advertisement or contains telemarketing, the ruling points to the rules that require prior express written consent.
  2. Disclosures. The rule's identification and disclosure requirements for artificial-voice messages apply, and calls that include an advertisement or constitute telemarketing must also offer the opt-out methods in the rules.
  3. No "live agent" carve-out. The ruling says the TCPA "does not allow for any carve out of technologies that purport to provide the equivalent of a live agent."

Service follow-up vs sales follow-up: why the difference matters

The regulation sorts artificial-voice calls by whether they include an advertisement or constitute telemarketing, and telemarketing turns on the call's purpose, not only on what is said. These are the rule's definitions:

The 's 2026 order describes the other group as informational calls, "a call or text message that does not contain any advertising or telemarketing."

In a store, the same call can move from one group to the other mid-script. Say the AI check-in asks how the brake job went, then mentions the declined front struts and a coupon. Whether the struts-and-coupon part "includes or introduces an advertisement" is the question the rules turn on, and it is one for counsel.

The table below uses the regulation's own words. It describes what the rules say; it does not say which category your calls fall into.

How to read it: each row is a call a store makes. Read across for the rule's words about it, and end on what to confirm with counsel.

The callWhat the rule calls itConsent the rule describesDisclosures the rule describes for artificial-voice callsConfirm with counsel
AI check-in after a repair order: "How did the car run? Anything we missed?" No offer.If the call contains no advertisement and is not made for the purpose of encouraging a purchase: a call "using... an artificial or prerecorded voice" that does not include an advertisement or constitute telemarketingTo a cell phone: "prior express consent of the called party". To a residential line: prior express consent, or a listed exemption for commercial calls with no advertising, subject to a call limit and opt-out dutiesIdentity of the business "at the beginning of the message"; a callback number "during or after the message". Calls under the residential exemption also need the automated opt-out mechanismHow and where we captured the customer's consent for this number; whether anything in the script could read as an advertisement; whether a check-in that also aims at the next visit is a dual-purpose call
The same check-in with an offer added: coupon, declined work, trade-in appraisalIf the offer makes it a call that "includes or introduces an advertisement or constitutes telemarketing": the rule's terms for those calls applyIf so, "prior express written consent" for cell phones and residential lines, defined as a signed written agreement with specific disclosuresIf so, identity and callback number, plus an "automated, interactive voice- and/or key press-activated opt-out mechanism" with brief instructions, within a set time after the identificationWhere the line sits between a check-in and an offer in our scripts; whether our signed consent covers artificial-voice calls
AI follow-up to an unsold showroom visitorTelemarketing, if the call is made "for the purpose of encouraging the purchase" of goods; it may also be a "telephone solicitation" for the calling-hours and national do-not-call rules, unless an exclusion in that definition applies, such as an established business relationshipIf the call includes an advertisement or constitutes telemarketing, "prior express written consent"If the call is telemarketing, same as the row above; if the call is a "telephone solicitation", also calling hours and the national do-not-call registry; and, for telemarketing, a company do-not-call list with a written policy and trained staffWhether a guest sheet, credit app or website lead form gave written consent that names artificial-voice calls; whether an established business relationship or another exclusion applies to our showroom visitors; how we check the do-not-call lists before each call
A manager's callback to an upset customer, dialed and spoken by a personThe artificial-voice provisions cover calls "using... an artificial or prerecorded voice"; whether a call dialed and spoken by a person falls outside them depends on the equipment and on whether any part uses an AI voice, so confirm with counsel. The telemarketing, calling-hours and do-not-call rules turn on the call's purposeDepends on the dialing equipment and the call's purposeIf any part of the call uses an AI voice, the artificial-voice disclosures applyWhether an AI voice that books or opens the callback changes the analysis; how our dialer is classified

What it tells you: the right-hand column is your agenda for the meeting with counsel.

Another definition sits in the background. The rule defines an "established business relationship" for telephone solicitations, based on a purchase or transaction within a set period or an inquiry within a shorter one. That definition appears in the "telephone solicitation" definition. The consent wording for artificial-voice telemarketing calls in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) does not mention it. Ask your counsel how these provisions fit together for your store before reading anything into a past purchase.

Takeaway

Have counsel mark where an offer starts in your check-in and showroom scripts, so your works from a script counsel has seen.

The rules use two levels of consent.

Prior express consent. The statute uses the phrase without defining it. In January 2025, the Eleventh Circuit held that the 2023 order's one-to-one and "logically and topically associated" consent restrictions conflicted with "the ordinary statutory meaning of 'prior express consent'" and exceeded the 's authority.

Prior express written consent. The rule defines this as "an agreement, in writing, bearing the signature of the person called that clearly authorizes the seller to deliver or cause to be delivered to the person called advertisements or telemarketing messages using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice," together with the telephone number. The agreement must clearly and conspicuously tell the person that signing authorizes those calls, and that they are "not required to sign the agreement... as a condition of purchasing any property, goods, or services." An electronic signature counts where federal law or state contract law recognizes it.

In a 2023 order, the FCC added restrictions saying consent had to be given to one seller at a time and be "logically and topically associated with the interaction" that prompted it. On January 24, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit vacated that part of the order (Part III.D) and sent it back to the FCC.

How courts read the statute

On June 20, 2025, the Supreme Court held in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v McKesson Corp. that district courts are not bound by the FCC's interpretation of the statute in enforcement cases. The Court said a district court "should interpret the statute as courts traditionally do under ordinary principles of statutory interpretation, affording appropriate respect to the agency's interpretation". In plain words: courts may read the themselves. What that means for any particular FCC ruling, including the AI ruling above, is a question for counsel; this page makes no prediction.

Takeaway

Ask counsel which level of consent each of your forms gives, from the service write-up to the website lead form. That tells you what your files cover.

What does an artificial-voice call have to say?

The regulation lists three things for artificial-voice messages.

  1. Who is calling. "At the beginning of the message, state clearly the identity of the business... responsible for initiating the call," using the name the business is registered under with the state. For a store that trades under one name and is registered under another, ask counsel which one the call uses.
  2. A number to call back. "During or after the message, state clearly the telephone number" of the business, which may not be a 900 number. For telemarketing and exempted residential calls, that number must let anyone make a do-not-call request during regular business hours.
  3. An automated opt-out, for some calls. Where the message includes an advertisement, constitutes telemarketing, or relies on a residential exemption, it must offer "an automated, interactive voice- and/or key press-activated opt-out mechanism" with brief instructions, shortly after the identification. When the person opts out, the mechanism "must automatically record the called person's number to the caller's do-not-call list and immediately terminate the call." A voicemail must also give a toll-free number that reaches the same mechanism.

Does the call have to say it is AI?

The federal rule quoted above does not use the words "artificial intelligence." The has proposed going further. Its proposed rule, published September 10, 2024, would "define AI-generated calls" and "require callers disclose to consumers when they receive an AI-generated call," along with disclosures when consumers consent to such calls. A Federal Register search on October 27, 2026 showed the proposal and no final rule. Check the status with counsel.

Some states have their own bot or AI disclosure laws; ask counsel which apply to you.

Takeaway

Give counsel the opening line your calls use today, word for word, to check how it names the store.

Since April 11, 2025, a called party may revoke consent "by using any reasonable method to clearly express a desire not to receive further calls or text messages from the caller." Requests made through an automated opt-out on a call, a reply text with words such as "stop," or a website or phone number the caller designates count as reasonable "per se." Other means, such as a voicemail or an email, create "a rebuttable presumption that the consumer has revoked consent."

Revocation requests must be honored "within a reasonable time not to exceed" a set number of business days from receipt. Do-not-call requests under paragraph (d) carry the same kind of limit, and a request recorded by a vendor still leaves the business the call was made for liable for failures to honor it.

The rule in force today lets a called party revoke consent by "any reasonable method"; ask counsel how that applies to a "stop" said in the middle of an AI call. After November 25, 2026, that can depend on whether the store designates an exclusive opt-out method; do-not-call requests on sales calls stay under paragraph (d)(3). Ask counsel how this applies to your calls. How that sentence gets from the call into your , and do-not-call list, and how fast, is the practical question.

What changes on November 25, 2026

The adopted an order on September 30, 2026 (FCC 26-67), published in the Federal Register on October 26, 2026, effective November 25, 2026. These are the changes a store should know about:

The order says it supersedes "the delayed effective date of the relevant portion of that rule that was previously extended to January 31, 2027." The same day, the FCC asked for comment on "reducing the timeframe callers must honor revocation requests" and "requiring a revoke all method," with comments due November 25, 2026 and replies due December 28, 2026.

Takeaway

Before November 25, 2026, ask counsel whether your store should designate an exclusive opt-out method. Then say "stop" on a test call and check when it shows up in your DMS, CRM and do-not-call list, so you know how long a request takes to reach each system that dials.

What changed, when

How to read it: each row is a ruling, order or court decision, with the primary source it comes from.

DateWhat happenedPrimary source (retrieved October 27, 2026)
February 8, 2024 Declaratory Ruling: AI-generated voices are "artificial or prerecorded voice" under the ; effective on releaseFCC 24-17, CG Docket 23-362 (docs.fcc.gov)
March 5, 2024FCC consent-revocation order published; paragraph (a)(12) took effect April 4, 2024, and the other revocation rules were delayed indefinitely89 FR 15756, FCC 24-24
September 10, 2024FCC proposes AI-generated call definition and disclosure rules89 FR 73321, FCC 24-84
January 24, 2025Eleventh Circuit vacates the one-to-one consent part of the FCC's 2023 orderInsurance Marketing Coalition v. FCC, No. 24-10277
April 11, 2025Revocation rules in 64.1200(a)(10)–(11) and (d)(3) take effect, except one portion of (a)(10), whose date was later delayed (to January 31, 2027) and then replaced by FCC 26-6789 FR 82518; 91 FR 67214
June 20, 2025Supreme Court: district courts interpret the statute themselves, giving the FCC's reading "appropriate respect"McLaughlin Chiropractic v. McKesson, 606 U.S. 146
November 25, 2026FCC 26-67 revocation changes take effect91 FR 67214
December 28, 2026Reply comments due on the FCC's further proposals on revocation timing and a revoke-all method91 FR 67239

What it tells you: the next date to plan for is November 25, 2026.

State "mini-TCPA" laws

Several states add their own rules for sales calls. Florida and Maryland are examples, from the statutes:

Florida. The Florida Telephone Solicitation Act bars an unsolicited "telephonic sales call" that uses "an automated system for the selection and dialing of telephone numbers or the playing of a recorded message" without the called party's "prior express written consent." It defines a telephonic sales call to include calls, texts and voicemails "for the purpose of soliciting a sale of any consumer goods or services." It gives a called party a private right of action. A separate Florida section sets calling hours and a cap on solicitation calls per person per day on the same subject for commercial telephone sellers.

Maryland. Maryland bars a telephone solicitation involving an automated dialing system or "the playing of a recorded message" without prior express written consent, and sets its own calling hours and a cap on calls in a day on the same subject. Subsection (a), the written-consent rule, lists situations it does not apply to, including some solicitations for maintenance or repair of goods the customer bought from the caller. The calling-hours and call-cap rules in subsection (c) have no such list. Whether any exception fits your calls is for counsel.

Other states have their own laws. Check every state you call into with counsel.

Call recording is a separate set of laws. Some states make recording lawful only when all parties consent. Florida's statute, for example, allows interception "when all of the parties to the communication have given prior consent." Maryland's has a similar all-party provision. If your AI calls are recorded or transcribed, ask counsel what notice each call needs.

TCPA compliance questions to take to your counsel

These are questions for the meeting; working through them does not by itself settle anything.

  1. How do we record consent for service calls, and separately for sales calls? Where does it live: , , the vendor, paper?
  2. Does our written consent language name artificial-voice or AI calls, and the number it covers?
  3. Is signing it optional, and does the form say so?
  4. Where is the line in our scripts between a check-in and an advertisement? Who signs off on script changes?
  5. Which name does the call open with: the store's trade name or the registered legal name?
  6. When a customer says "stop" mid-call, how does that reach our do-not-call list and our CRM, and how fast?
  7. Do we designate an exclusive opt-out method after November 25, 2026, and how is it disclosed on each call?
  8. Does an opt-out from a sales call stop every sales call from every rooftop in our group?
  9. Which states do we call into, and what calling hours and call caps apply in each?
  10. Are our calls recorded or transcribed, and what notice does each state require?
  11. Which vendor holds which record (consent, call audio, opt-outs), and for how long?
  12. Does the pending AI-disclosure proposal, or any state law, change what our calls should say?

Takeaway

Put a name from your store next to each question before the meeting, so each answer counsel gives has someone who acts on it.

Where Lokam fits

Consent stays your dealership's: Lokam doesn't collect or decide it. Lokam AI is a post-visit follow-up product for US franchise dealerships. It is not a replacement for your survey, not an inbound answering bot, not a , and not a replacement for your people.

When your store calls customers using Lokam's AI assistant:

Whether a store's calls meet these rules is a question for the store's own counsel.

The facts behind these lines are on our facts page. Related reading: what an AI BDC is and why dealership calls show "Spam Likely". If you are a customer who got a call, this page is for you.

FAQ

Are AI calls legal?
The has said the 's rules for "artificial or prerecorded voice" calls cover current AI voices, which means the consent, disclosure and opt-out rules for those calls apply. Whether a particular store's calls meet them depends on its consent records, scripts and states, which is a question for counsel.

What does TCPA consent mean?
The rules describe two levels: "prior express consent," which the statute uses without defining, and "prior express written consent," a signed written agreement that authorizes artificial-voice or autodialed telemarketing to a named number and says signing is not a condition of purchase. Which level a call needs depends on whether it includes an advertisement or constitutes telemarketing.

What is TCPA compliance?
It is shorthand for meeting what the statute and the FCC's rules require, among other things: the consent the rules describe for each kind of call, the identification and opt-out disclosures in 47 64.1200(b), honoring revocations and do-not-call requests, and calling-hour limits for solicitations. This is not a complete list: it leaves out the autodialer rules, state law and call recording, for example. Your counsel decides how those apply to your store.

Can you sue for a TCPA violation?
The statute gives people who receive calls a private right of action to stop violations and to recover actual loss or a set statutory amount per violation (for do-not-call claims, up to a set amount, after at least two calls in 12 months), and lets courts increase awards for willful or knowing violations. State attorneys general can also sue.

Is it legal to use AI voice calls to follow up with customers?
The rules don't answer that with a yes or no. They describe what consent, disclosures and opt-outs an artificial-voice call needs, and those depend on whether the call includes an advertisement or constitutes telemarketing, as the rule defines those terms. Take the questions above to your counsel.

This page explains public rules; it is not legal advice. Talk to your counsel.

Legal sources reviewed: October 27, 2026. Sources retrieved October 27, 2026.

Explore Further

Cut churn at the source: fix the problems before customers leave.

See how it works in a 30-minute demo.

Book a Demo →